The Disciplinary Crossover
There's a particular quality to spaces designed by people who work in multiple creative fields. At World Archi Design, we've been tracking how interdisciplinary practitioners approach residential projects, and the results often reveal a level of restraint that single-discipline designers might resist. Sydney Wayser and Isaac Watters, both musicians who also practice interior design and architecture respectively, have produced an accessory dwelling unit in Los Angeles that demonstrates this sensibility.
The 25-foot cubic structure sits in Angelino Heights, a neighborhood where topography and density have long shaped how residents negotiate privacy and light. What distinguishes this project from the typical ADU typology is its commitment to a single formal gesture: the white cube, interrupted only by rectilinear voids that function as both fenestration and compositional device.
Massing as Discipline
Granada Form, the practice behind the project, chose to work within strict geometric constraints. The cube is not a default condition in residential architecture; it requires deliberate calibration of interior volume against exterior presence. At 25 feet, the structure occupies a footprint that could easily have been stretched or compressed to accommodate more conventional room proportions. Instead, the designers held to the square plan, forcing every interior decision to respond to that initial parti.
The façade cutouts are not arbitrary. Each opening is positioned to frame specific views or admit light at calculated angles, creating a rhythm across the elevation that reads as both functional and sculptural. This approach recalls the work of Alberto Campo Baeza, whose white cubic forms in Spain similarly use aperture as the primary means of articulation. But where Campo Baeza often works at larger scales and with more pronounced cantilevers, this ADU operates within the tighter constraints of infill urbanism.
Material Restraint and Context
White stucco or painted concrete has become a default material language for contemporary residential work in Southern California, but its ubiquity should not diminish its effectiveness when handled with precision. The monochrome surface here serves to emphasize the play of shadow and light across the rectilinear cutouts. In the bright Los Angeles sun, those voids become dark geometric shapes that shift throughout the day, animating an otherwise static form.
The choice to avoid any secondary material or color reinforces the project's conceptual clarity. There are no wood accents, no metal screens, no textured panels. This level of restraint is uncommon in small-scale residential work, where the temptation to add variation or warmth often leads to a layering of finishes. The designers evidently trusted the form itself to carry the architectural interest.
Interior Spatial Logic
Working within a 25-foot cube presents specific challenges for interior layout. The volume is generous enough to avoid feeling cramped, but compact enough that every partition and threshold must be carefully considered. Wayser, as an interior designer, would have been attuned to how circulation and program interact within this constrained footprint.
The openings in the façade become the primary means of orienting the interior spaces. Rather than relying on a central corridor or open plan, the rooms likely organize around these apertures, each framed view or light source defining a distinct zone. This strategy is common in compact European residential work, where fenestration often dictates spatial hierarchy more than partition walls do.
The Creative Practitioner as Client-Designer
One of the more interesting aspects of this project is the dual role of its creators. Wayser and Watters are both inhabitants and designers, which collapses the typical client-architect dynamic. This arrangement can yield either highly idiosyncratic results or unusually disciplined ones, depending on the practitioners involved. Here, the outcome leans toward discipline.
Musicians, particularly those who also engage in visual or spatial practice, often bring a sensitivity to rhythm and proportion that translates well into architecture. The rectilinear cutouts across this façade operate much like syncopation in a musical composition: they create a pattern that is regular enough to be legible but varied enough to sustain interest. This is not accidental. The formal decisions here suggest an awareness of pacing and interval that is more common in sound-based work than in conventional architectural training.
ADU Typology and Urban Infill
Accessory dwelling units have become a significant typology in Los Angeles over the past decade, driven by both housing policy and market demand. The results have been mixed. Many ADUs default to generic shed forms or historicist gestures that mimic the main house. This project takes a different approach, asserting its presence as a distinct object rather than a deferential addition.
The cubic form and monochrome finish make the structure legible as a contemporary intervention, but the restraint in detailing prevents it from reading as aggressive or out of scale. This balance is difficult to achieve in infill projects, where new construction must negotiate existing fabric without either disappearing into it or overwhelming it. The success here lies in the clarity of the formal strategy: the cube is confident but not overbearing, distinct but not disruptive.
Precedents and Parallels
The white cubic ADU invites comparison with a lineage of minimalist residential work that stretches from the early modernists through to contemporary practices like Johnston Marklee or Fran Silvestre Arquitectos. What these precedents share is a commitment to formal reduction and material simplicity as a means of achieving spatial intensity.
In the context of Los Angeles, this approach also resonates with the work of Rudolph Schindler and Richard Neutra, both of whom explored how geometric clarity and careful fenestration could mediate the relationship between interior and exterior in a climate that encourages permeability. The rectilinear cutouts in this ADU perform a similar function, framing views and admitting light without relying on large expanses of glazing.
Spatial Outcomes and Future Directions
The project demonstrates that the ADU typology, often constrained by budget and regulation, can still be a site for rigorous formal exploration. The 25-foot cube is not a compromise; it is a deliberate choice that organizes every subsequent decision. The rectilinear voids, the monochrome finish, the interior layout, all follow from that initial geometric commitment.
As accessory dwelling units continue to proliferate across Los Angeles and other dense urban markets, this project offers a model for how small-scale infill can assert architectural ambition without resorting to complexity or excess. The clarity here is both formal and conceptual, a quality that reflects the interdisciplinary background of its designers and their willingness to let a single idea structure the entire project.
The neighborhood has already taken notice, with the structure becoming a minor landmark for local residents. Whether this reflects a broader appetite for contemporary design in historically eclectic districts like Angelino Heights remains to be seen. What is clear is that when creative practitioners design for themselves, the results can offer insights that more conventional client-driven projects might not yield.
Save this story. A free account keeps your reading list and the 07:00 email in one place.
CREATE FREE ACCOUNT →SIGN IN



